This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
igsn:11_july_2012_wednesday_telecon [2012/07/11 13:52] lhsu |
igsn:11_july_2012_wednesday_telecon [2012/07/11 16:30] (current) lhsu [Notes] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
- status of registration of IGSN eV | - status of registration of IGSN eV | ||
+ | - registration is in progress, the papers are at the court. | ||
- IGSN syntax | - IGSN syntax | ||
+ | - recent emails summary: IGSN syntax is still open. It looks to me like we need a hybrid system of 9-character (non-mnemonic) and longer (mnemonic) names. | ||
+ | - Elsevier linking proposal - we need to confirm: Elsevier can resolve the following syntax ‘IGSN: (space) number’. | ||
- Registration agents & their relation to the SESAR metadata clearinghouse | - Registration agents & their relation to the SESAR metadata clearinghouse | ||
- Metadata schemas? (what has happened in the working group?) | - Metadata schemas? (what has happened in the working group?) | ||
+ | - IGSN metadata schema ready to be finalised | ||
+ | - IGSN registration web service ready once the schema is finalised. | ||
+ | - SESAR metadata schema is final (?) | ||
- Upcoming IGC workshop and how to deal with potential membership applications | - Upcoming IGC workshop and how to deal with potential membership applications | ||
+ | - AGU Session on Unique Identifiers - who to invite? | ||
- Any more comments on {{: | - Any more comments on {{: | ||
- Instead of "" | - Instead of "" | ||
- | - AGU Session on Unique Identifiers | + | - New membership applications: |
+ | | ||
+ | - Status of SESAR interface development? | ||
=====Notes===== | =====Notes===== | ||
+ | - Discussion about syntax: | ||
+ | - DOI syntax: http:// | ||
+ | - http:// | ||
+ | - Decided to go ahead with the suggested best practice and the possibility to deviate, but need procedure to do so. | ||
+ | - New Members procedure | ||
+ | - Likely that there will be questions about joining while at IGC. We had decided that they need to write a letter, and the group will decide together. | ||
+ | - Metadata Clearinghouse | ||
+ | - Discussion of whether this be mandatory or optional | ||
+ | - To follow the DataCite model, for an IGSN to be assigned the core set of metadata must be deposited at a clearinghouse. | ||
+ | - Metadata Schema | ||
+ | - We should move ahead and if changes are needed in the future then there can be amendments. | ||
+ | - Jens will release tomorrow. | ||
+ | - S.Cox: Regarding the metadata scheme: I can see how it maps into other data models that I'm familiar with (e.g. ISO 19156:2011 Specimen model) so I am comfortable. | ||
+ | - S.Cox: Would be good to see a SPARQL end-point interface onto the metadata catalogue | ||
=====Actions===== | =====Actions===== | ||
+ | - Document the recommended practice for the syntax, and the procedure to deviate (KL and JK) | ||
+ | - Document the proposed namespace management / allocation (KL and JK) | ||
+ | - Brochure feedback by July 20th (everyone) | ||
+ | - Namespace assignment must be discussed at the next call. | ||
+ | - Next call middle of September, set up Doodle poll (LH). Here: http:// |