igsn:11_july_2012_wednesday_telecon
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
igsn:11_july_2012_wednesday_telecon [2012/07/11 13:55] lhsu |
igsn:11_july_2012_wednesday_telecon [2012/07/11 16:30] (current) lhsu [Notes] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| - IGSN syntax | - IGSN syntax | ||
| - recent emails summary: IGSN syntax is still open. It looks to me like we need a hybrid system of 9-character (non-mnemonic) and longer (mnemonic) names. | - recent emails summary: IGSN syntax is still open. It looks to me like we need a hybrid system of 9-character (non-mnemonic) and longer (mnemonic) names. | ||
| - | - Elsevier linking proposal - we need to confirm: | + | - Elsevier linking proposal - we need to confirm: |
| - Registration agents & their relation to the SESAR metadata clearinghouse | - Registration agents & their relation to the SESAR metadata clearinghouse | ||
| - Metadata schemas? (what has happened in the working group?) | - Metadata schemas? (what has happened in the working group?) | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| - Status of SESAR interface development? | - Status of SESAR interface development? | ||
| =====Notes===== | =====Notes===== | ||
| + | - Discussion about syntax: | ||
| + | - DOI syntax: http:// | ||
| + | - http:// | ||
| + | - Decided to go ahead with the suggested best practice and the possibility to deviate, but need procedure to do so. | ||
| + | - New Members procedure | ||
| + | - Likely that there will be questions about joining while at IGC. We had decided that they need to write a letter, and the group will decide together. | ||
| + | - Metadata Clearinghouse | ||
| + | - Discussion of whether this be mandatory or optional | ||
| + | - To follow the DataCite model, for an IGSN to be assigned the core set of metadata must be deposited at a clearinghouse. | ||
| + | - Metadata Schema | ||
| + | - We should move ahead and if changes are needed in the future then there can be amendments. | ||
| + | - Jens will release tomorrow. | ||
| + | - S.Cox: Regarding the metadata scheme: I can see how it maps into other data models that I'm familiar with (e.g. ISO 19156:2011 Specimen model) so I am comfortable. | ||
| + | - S.Cox: Would be good to see a SPARQL end-point interface onto the metadata catalogue | ||
| =====Actions===== | =====Actions===== | ||
| + | - Document the recommended practice for the syntax, and the procedure to deviate (KL and JK) | ||
| + | - Document the proposed namespace management / allocation (KL and JK) | ||
| + | - Brochure feedback by July 20th (everyone) | ||
| + | - Namespace assignment must be discussed at the next call. | ||
| + | - Next call middle of September, set up Doodle poll (LH). Here: http:// | ||
igsn/11_july_2012_wednesday_telecon.1342014930.txt.gz · Last modified: 2012/07/11 13:55 by lhsu
Page Tools
